Mining Wise International

Taxes can be distinguished by the effect they have on the allocation of income and wealth. A proportional tax is the kind that imposes the same relative burden on every taxpayer—i.e., in the case where tax liability and income move in relative proportion. A progressive tax is recognised by a greater than proportional rise in the tax liability relative to the growth in income, and a regressive tax is characterized by a less than proportional rise in the relative liability. Therefore, progressive taxes are thought of as reducing a lack of equality in income distribution, whereas regressive taxes might have the effect of increasing these inequalities.

The taxes that are usually considered progressive include individual income taxes and estate taxes. Income taxes that are categorically progressive, however, can become less so for the upper-income group—particularly if a taxpayer is able to lessen his tax base by claiming deductions or by excluding certain income elements from his taxable income. Proportional tax rates that are applied to lower-income classes would also be more progressive if such personal exemptions are made.

Income measured over a given year does not necessarily give the most appropriate measure of taxpaying requirements. For example, transitory growth in income can be saved, and during temporary declines in income a taxpayer could select to pay for consumption by taking from savings. Ergo, if taxation is made comparable along with “permanent income,” it would be less regressive (or more progressive) than if it is made comparable with annual income.

Sales taxes and excises (except those on luxuries) tend to be regressive, because the share of one’s income consumed or spent for specific goods declines as the rate of personal income increases. Poll taxes (also known as head taxes), calculated as a standard amount per capita, obviously are regressive.

It is difficult to dictate corporate income taxes and taxes on business as progressive, regressive, or proportionate, due to the uncertainty surrounding the ability of businesses to shift their tax expenses (see below Shifting and incidence). This difficulty of determining who bears the tax burden is dependant crucially on whether a national or a subnational (that is, provincial or state) tax is being determined.

In regarding the economic effects of taxation, it is necessary to differentiate between several concepts of tax rates. The statutory rates are those dictated in the law; usually these are marginal rates, but for some cases they are median rates. Marginal income tax rates denote the fraction of incremental income that is demanded by taxation when income increases by one dollar. Thus, if tax burden grows by 45 cents when income grows by one dollar, the marginal tax rate is 45 percent. Income tax statutes usually contain graduated marginal rates—i.e., rates that increase as income rises. Structured analysis of marginal tax rates should regard provisions in addition to the formal statutory rate structure. If, for example, a particular tax credit (reduction in tax) declines by 20 cents for each one-dollar increase in income, the marginal rate is 20 percentage points more than nominated by the statutory rates. Since marginal rates indicate how after-tax income increases or decreases in response to changes in before-tax income, they are the necessary ones for appraising incentive effects of taxation. It is even more complicated to nominate the marginal effective tax rate to apply to income from business and capital, because it may be reliant on such considerations as the structure of depreciation allowances, the deductibility of interest, and the provisions for inflation adjustment. A basic economic theorem holds that the marginal effective tax rate in income from capital is nothing under a consumption-based tax.

Average income tax rates signify the percentage of total income that is required in taxation. The pattern of average rates is the one that is important for assessing the distributional equity of taxation. Under a progressive income tax the average income tax rate grows with income. Average income tax rates commonly increase with income, both because personal allowances are granted for the taxpayer and dependents and also due to that marginal tax rates are graduated; conversely, preferential treatment of income received for the most part by high-income households might swamp these effects, forcing regressivity, as displayed by average tax rates that decrease as income grows.

For MYOB Brisbane expert advice, contact Stone Consulting today. Stone Consulting also runs MYOB training in Brisbane.